Romans 12:3
Ronald L. Geib
rongeib at ptd.net
Sun Apr 28 23:25:25 EDT 2002
> > I am studying Romans 12:3 I am trying to understand the meaning of the
> > last phrase, hEKASTWi hWS hO QEOS EMERISEN METRON PISTEWS. On my initial
> > reading, I translated this phrase as " . . . according to the standard,
> > faith, that God gave to each." C.E.B. Cranfield argues in the ICC
> > commentary that hEKASTWi is in dative case because of attraction. This
> > would yield something like ". . . each [should think of himself in sober
> > judgement]according to the standard, faith, that God gave." Would hEKASTWi
> > be attracted to the phrase "PANTI TWi ONTI EN hUMIN" that occurs in the
> > earlier part of the verse, and what clues would I look for to indicate
> > that this was the case?
> >
> > Thank You,
> > Ron Geib
>
> LEGW GAR DIA THS CARITOS THS DOQEISHS MOI PANTI TWi ONTI EN hUMIN, MH
> hUPERFRONEIN PAR' hO DEI FRONEIN, ALLA FRONEIN EIS TO SWFRONEIN, hEKASTWI
> hWS O QEOS EMERISEN METRON PISTEWS.
>
> I think the way "attraction" is meant here is irrelevant to PANTI TWi ONTI
> EN hUMIN. The implied subject of hYPERFRONEIN and FRONEIN is AUTON
> (regarding PANTA TON ONTA EN hUMIN). So, according to the commentary, the
> accusative hEKASTON would have been appropriate here if hEKASTWi hadn't
> functioned as an object (objective dative) of EMERISEN.
>
> You may also have a look at 1 Cor 7:17
>
> EI MH hEKASTWi hWS EMERISEN O QEOS, hEKASTON hWS KEKLHKEN O QEOS, OUTW
> PERIPATEITW.
>
> The subject of PERIPATEITW is the implied hEKASTOS; but as an object of
> EMERISEN and KEKLHKEN it occurs in dative and accusative- not in
> nominative as it "should".
To Manolis Nikolaou:
After reading your response, I re-studied Cranfields comments and
realized I had misunderstood them. I had originally understood him to be
removing the function of an objective dative from hEKASTWi and regarding
it instead as a nominative. In my understanding, this changed the phrase
so that instead of asserting that God apportioned a measure (or standard)
to each person, it asserted that God gave one measure that each person
should use as a standard. Thank You for helping me to understand more
clearly the passage in question as well as the intentions of the
commentator.
Ron Geib
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list