2 Cor. 3:14
Paul Toseland
toseland at blueyonder.co.uk
Mon Aug 5 19:50:02 EDT 2002
>It seems to me in this context with EPWRWQH TA NOHMATA that
>the conditional does not fit. I think he is saying "since
>the veil is not removed for it is nullified (only) in Christ.
>This seems to fit better with the overall point of the passage.
Thank you, Carlton; I always value greatly your opinion.
But if 'only' is read into the hOTI clause of v. 14, may I ask
also how I should I understand the opening ALLA of v. 15?
It usualy seems to be taken to be ascensive: 'Indeed';
but isn't ALLA always adversative, even when it is ascensive
('Not only this, but'; 'But rather')?
A)LL' hEWS SHMERON hHNIKA AN ANAGINWSKHTAI MWUSHS KALUMMA EPI
THN KARDIAN AUTWN KEITAI
Paul Toseland
Bristol, UK
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list