Romans 1:17
Paul Toseland
toseland at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Aug 6 18:15:25 EDT 2002
EK PISTEWS EIS PISTIN
On Aug 5 2002 Carl Conrad wrote,
>The principal threads on this topic are to be found in
>Feb 1996, July 1996,February 1997, and August 1999.
>I won't try to specify the dates more narrowly nor point
>to the other brief and sporadic discussions of this
>verse and problem.
Thanks, Carl, it has been interesting reviewing these
posts. However, in respect of the phrase EK PISTEWS
EIS PISTIN, no firm conclusions were reached; the
construction remained a mystery.
One of the sporadic discussions, contributed by Wayne
Leman on Oct 28 2002, cited a biref paper in 'The Bible
Translator' which surely throws some light:
Benware, W. A. 'Romans 1:17 and Cognitive Grammar',
BT 51 (2000) 330-40.
Benware has studied the construction EK noun phrase
EIS noun phrase, and reports that the following points
hold good 'throughout Greek literature':
(1) NOUN PHRASE encompasses all types of
nouns.
(2) Anarthrous noun phrases are by far the most
common, but demonstratives in anaphoric reference
are not uncommon, e.g. EK TINOS EIS TI ('from this
to that').
(3) The construction occurs with different noun
phrases, as well as dientical ones.
And in the case where the two noun phrases are
identical,
(4) The verb with which the expression occurs is
always non-telic.
(5) When the nouns are concrete, the verb expresses
movement from one liocation to another.
(6) The idom maintains 'the exact conceptual identity'
of the two nouns.
Examples include EK TOPOU EIS TOPON ('from
Place to place'), EX ALOGOU EIS ALOGON ('from
absurdity to absurdity'), and from biblical literature,
EK DUNAMEWS EIS DUNAMIN (Ps 83:8 XX), EK
KAKWN EIS KAKA (Jer 9:3 LXX), and EK QANATOU
EIS QANATON, EK ZWHS EIS ZWHN (2 Cor 2:16).
Arguing from Cognitive Grammar (he says the
principles Of this field relating to prepositions are
generally agreed among practitioners; I wont try to
summarize his reasoning here), he argues that
the idiom simply underscores immutability,
unchangeableness.
He argues quite persuasively that Rom 1:17 should
Be translated along these lines:
'In the gospel, right relationship with God is being
revealed: It is a path which begins in faith and ends
in faith.'
Any comments would be much appreciated; this is
Very significant for my work on 2 Corinthians!
Paul Toseland
Bristol
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list