Rom. 2:6-8--why nominatives in THAT slot?
Mike Sangrey
msangrey at BlueFeltHat.org
Fri Aug 9 14:38:57 EDT 2002
Rom. 2:6-8
hOS APODWSEI hEKASTWi KATA TA ERGA AUTOU
TOIS MEN KAQ' hUPOMONHN ERGOU AGAQOU
DOXAN KAI TIMHN KAI AFQARSIAN ZHTOUSIN, ZWHN AIWNION:
TOIS DE EX ERIQEIAS KAI APEIQOUSI THi ALHQEIAi
PEIQOMENOIS DE THi ADIKIAi,ORGH KAI QUMOS
Given the parallelism (hopefully highlighted by the formatting) in this
text, why are ORGH and QUMOS nominatives? I expected accusatives.
--
Mike Sangrey
msangrey at BlueFeltHat.org
Landisburg, Pa.
"The first one last wins."
"A net of highly cohesive details reveals the truth."
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list