Technology and Grammar
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Fri Aug 16 20:54:21 EDT 2002
In a message dated 8/16/2002 11:52:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
eweiss at gte.net writes:
I believe that some of this was done by Dan Wallace in writing and
checking his exegetical syntax book, GREEK GRAMMAR BEYOND THE BASICS. His
syntax categories and exegetical conclusions were at times based on
computer examinations of the Greek text. I think he also has
discussed/used this methodology for some of his essays at www.bible.org
("The Prof's Soapbox). He at least has mentioned how programs like
accordance and gramcord now allow scholars and even students to validate
or determine grammatical "rules" or usages with greater precision and
speed than has ever before been possible.
____________________________________________
I think it's important to realize that computers are simply machines which
can add one and one -- but they do it very fast. They are not truly able to
think. It is the human sitting at the keyboard who through the composition
of the program which governs the action of the computer or who through the
data which he imputs into the program who determines the outcome. A flawed
methodology exemplified in a poorly constructed program or faulty data which
is input will produce a faulty product. GIGO -- "garbage in, garbage out."
One does not simply hand a text to a computer and say, "Here, analyze this."
The old excuse "It's a computer error" won't work. Computers generally
either work or they don't. If there is an error it is the human who made the
error.
Having said that, I think there is great potential for using a computer to
analyze the data so long as one can ascetain that the methodology employed
and the data supplied are accurate. The machine will not think for you.
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list