Codex Bezae (D05) Readings #6-9
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Thu Aug 22 20:39:37 EDT 2002
In a message dated 8/22/2002 8:00:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu writes:
8 - Lk 1:26 NA27/USB4: APESTALH hO AGGELOS APO TOU QEOU; D05: ... hUPO TOU
QEOU
Envoyé ... par Dieu. Il semble que la différenciation UPO / APO se soit
atténuée avec le temps, APO remplaçant progressivement UPO. Aussi la
correction de upo en apo ne témoignerait-elle pas d'une rédaction plus
tardive ? Mais b-greek a peut-être déjà traité du sujet? ["Sent ... by God.
It appears that the distinction between hUPO and APO weakened with time,
APO progressively replacing hUPO. Is it also possible that the correction
of hUPO into APO might attest a later redaction? But perhaps B-Greek has
already held a discussion of this matter?"]
____________________________
I'm wondering what Randall Buth would say regarding this. My understanding
is that these MSS were "mass produced" by having one monk read while the
others listened and wrote. Would the pronunciation perhaps be such as to
result in an error of hearing (if the monk reading did not simply misread).
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list