examples of unusual word order in hina and hoti clauses
c stirling bartholomew
cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net
Thu Aug 29 16:04:46 EDT 2002
on 8/29/02 5:38 AM, Michael Burer wrote:
> MONON TWN PTWCHWN hINA MNHMONEUWMEN
>
> TWN PTWCHWN is here functioning as the direct object of the verb
> MNHMONEUWMEN, but it actually precedes the hINA. My first impression is
> that it is outside the boundary of the hINA clause.
Michael,
I would not consider TWN PTWCHWN as a **grammatical** constituent within the
hINA clause. TWN PTWCHWN appears to function as a *topic*, it is what the
hINA clause *comments* about.
In terms of grammatical function, TWN PTWCHWN looks like an adverbial
constituent limiting the entire hINA clause, but not a constituent within
the clause. It defines the scope of MNHMONEUWMEN.
I think the whole "emphasis" issue is a false scent.
Clay
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list