Future Passive Indicatives in NT
Carl W. Conrad
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Tue Dec 10 12:20:08 EST 2002
At 10:27 AM -0600 12/10/02, Paul S Dixon wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:18:11 -0600 "Carl W. Conrad"
><cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu> writes:
>> At 9:49 AM -0600 12/10/02, Paul S Dixon wrote:
>> >I did a count of the future passive indicatives in the NT (Logos
>> >software) and came up with 296 hits (*QHSO* or *QHSE* or *QHSH* and
>> not
>> >*QHSIO*).
>> >
>> >Anybody get a different count?
>>
>> Accordance shows 297 hits for future passive (QHSe/o)
>> morphoparadigm--pretty close. Now, the question is how many of
>> these
>> actually have a passive SENSE?
>
>In our spare time perhaps Steve and I can divvy it up and work on it, but
>you will have to factor in my passive disposition. :)
>
>Perhaps a good middle man would help.
It DOES help to have a sense of humor with this! I've always thought I was
a pretty good middle man; I now have a listing; I should be able to give
you my own judgment of how many of these are middle and how many passive. I
would expect that some will be disputed, but not very many.
--
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad at ioa.com
WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list