Accordance vs. BibleWorks

Steven Lo Vullo slovullo at mac.com
Wed Nov 6 18:11:05 EST 2002


On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Penner wrote:

> Others who do not need these modules may find BibleWorks more useful,
> with its several versions of the GNT, HMT, LXX, and Vulgate, and 
> perhaps
> more abundant lexical aids.

I don't think BibleWorks offers more abundant *up-to-date* lexical 
aids. Leaving aside the modules they have in common, BibleWorks has 
ANLEX, which Accordance doesn't offer, but Accordance offers LEH, which 
BibleWorks doesn't offer. If we include "word book" types of tools, 
Accordance offers TWOT (upcoming), Jenni-Westermann, NIDOTTE, NIDNTT, 
Spicq, and "Little Kittel." Of these, I think BibleWorks has only TWOT. 
And Accordance offers the following grammatical tools: Wheeler Hebrew, 
Wheeler Greek, Wallace's GGBB, and Stevens grammar.
============

Steven R. Lo Vullo
Madison, WI




More information about the B-Greek mailing list