two models?
hefin jones
hefinjones at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 25 04:03:14 EDT 2002
George Said...
>Forwarded for George Somsel <Polycarp66 at aol.com>
>Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:07:38 EDT
>
>I would go further than even you go. I don't see discourse analysis as
>properly being a function of grammar at all. Grammar deals with the
>traditional subjects included in it for many, many years. This is not to
>disparage discourse analysis. I think discourse analysis has a very
>valuable contribution to make to an improved understanding of the text;
>it's just that it is not grammar.
>
>gfsomsel
>
Hefin Jones (who once long ago was a linguistics student...) says...
Amen.
PS --- To understand why DA is not grammar have a read of Dan Sperber and
Deidrie Wilson's "Relevance: Cognition and Communication" (Oxford:
Blackwells).
_________________________________________________________________
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list