Acts 2.37 - AKOUSANTES

Mark Wilson emory2oo2 at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 16 08:24:34 EDT 2002



John:

You wrote:

----------
>I can't find anyone who addresses the implications of AKOUSANTES in Acts
>2.37 except the old Puritan, Thomas Hooker.
>
>Does this aorist active participle justify suggesting a period of time
>passing between Peter's Pentecost sermon and KATENUGNHSAN as he
>suggests?
----------

If time has elapsed, I rather suspect that this is understood
on reasons other than the tense of this participle. But surely
these men had to hear AND THEN comprehend what was heard
in order for it to have had this SUBSEQUENT impact upon them, right?

My thoughts,

Mark Wilson


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




More information about the B-Greek mailing list