[B-Greek] John 13:4-5 present tenses
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Thu Mar 13 14:55:39 EST 2003
In a message dated 3/13/2003 2:19:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, eweiss at gte.net
writes:
> Closer to the verses at hand, the EIPEN in 13:7 would, I think, be LEGEI
> if this were merely a string of "historical presents" (unless it's
> formulaic to use APOKRIQEIS KAI EIPEN rather than the present forms of
> these verbs), and in 13:8,9 and 10, LEGEI is used (with APEKRIQH --
> aorist -- interrupting in 13:8b). I would be happy to regard the
> presents in this passage as historical presents except for:
> the aorist interruptions of EIPEN in 13:12 and 13:21;
> the NA-27 accepted LEGEI (present) in 13:24;
> the use of APOKRINETAI (present) in 13:26 (which makes the APEKRIQH in
> 13:8b puzzling if this is all a "historical present").
> Things like this make me wonder what John uses the various tenses for.
> Style? Whim? Conformity to Hebrew discourse markers as one has sugggested?
> Am I seeing too much -- i.e., thinking there are peculiarities here
> where there really aren't?
>
I think what you have is a situation where the narrator falls out of his
framework. If I were to tell the old story about the man sitting in the bar
. . . well, let's just do it.
A man was [past] in this bar and noticed [past] this other guy who was making
[imperfect] strange gestures so he walks [historical present] over to him and
says [historical present], "Hey, why are you waving your arms around like
that and the other man says [historical present], "I'm chasing away the
elephants." The man says [historical present] to him, "There aren't any
elephants in here." The man replied [past], "I'm doing a good job, aren't I?"
It's simply a failure to consistently follow through with the historical
present.
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list