[B-Greek] Re: John 6:51
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Tue Mar 18 11:14:40 EST 2003
In a message dated 3/18/2003 10:29:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
willker at chemie.uni-bremen.de writes:
> gfsomsel wrote:
> >Then there is no omission. The difference is between hHN (N-A) and
> >hON (Byz).
>
> No, the difference is that the Byz text adds the phrase HN EGW DWSW,
> which is not in the critical text. My question: What problem is there
> without the phrase?
>
> Compare:
> >Nestle-Aland
> >KAI O ARTOS DE ON EGW DWSW
> >H SARX MOU ESTIN
> >UPER THS TOU KOSMOU ZWHS.
> >
> >Byzantine text
> >KAI O ARTOS DE ON EGW DWSW
> >H SARX MOU ESTIN
> >*** HN EGW DWSW ***
> >UPER THS TOU KOSMOU ZWHS
>
Oh! I see now. My reading was suffering from mental haplography. The Byz
text has a repetition of the phrase with a fem relative for the masc. Forget
what I said before since I think I mispoke. The difference can be
illustrated in translation.
N-A
"The bread which I give is my flesh for the life of the world"
BT
"The bread which I give is my flesh which I give for the life of the world"
I still don't see a problem with the N-A text. If there were a problem, I
would assume it would fall under the category of lectio difficilior (but this
is not a textual criticism forum).
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list