[B-Greek] Correct reading of Philo text.......
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000 at comcast.net
Tue Oct 14 12:54:30 EDT 2003
Palm, David wrote:
>Now the syntax of the sentence is straightforward and its meaning is clear
>enough, but I am confused by the second word, OU. It doesn't make sense to
>me, given the negative MH immediately following. OU is what is printed in
>the Loeb volume, but I'm wondering if perhaps it shouldn't be hOU instead,
>thus, hEWS hOU PEPRESBEUMEQA. I wouldn't dare "amend" such a printed text
>on my own authority, so I'm looking to see what others think of this. Is
>hEWS OU or hEWS hOU the correct reading?
>
>
FWIW, the TLG has OU not hOU
The reading is that in the text of ad Gaium edited by Cohn & Reiter
Yours,
Jeffrey Gibson
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
Chicago, Illinois
e-mail jgibson000 at comcast.net
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list