[B-Greek] Col 2:16;17

Tony Costa tmcos at rogers.com
Sun Apr 18 20:24:47 EDT 2004


I suppose that the neuter plural relative pronoun hA would refer to SABBATWN
which is also neuter plural and is its immediate antecedent. I wonder
whether hA would also refer to the previous nouns as well even though they
are feminine (food, drink, feasts, new moon)? This however would violate
grammatical rules.

Tony Costa

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mitch Larramore" <mitchlarramore at yahoo.com>
To: "B Greek" <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: [B-Greek] Col 2:16;17


>
> MH OUN TIS hUMAS KRINETW EN BRWSEI KAI EN POSEI H EN
> MEREI hEORTHS H NEOMHNIAS H SABBATWN
>
> hA ESTIN SKIA TWN MELLONTWN, TO DE SWMA TOU CRISTOU
>
> Why is SKIA fem. sing. and hA neut. pl.? I was
> expecting SKIA to be a plural?
>
> =====
> Mitch Larramore
> Spring Branch, Texas
> Student/Memorial High School
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
> http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek




More information about the B-Greek mailing list