[B-Greek] Re; Ro 16:7
George F Somsel
gfsomsel at juno.com
Tue Dec 21 13:59:31 EST 2004
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:34:36 -0500 Jim West <jwest at highland.net> writes:
> Sorry, but I forgot to include in my previous note as illustration of
>
> Wallace's bias (which he is of course entitled to) this tidbit from
>
> footnote 8 of his article:
>
> "the evidence thus far adduced falls right in line with our working
> hypothesis"
>
> In other words, we are finding exactly what we expected to find.
> That
> isn't exegesis, it is eisegesis.
>
> Best
>
> Jim
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> Jim West, ThD
> Adjunct Professor of Biblical Studies
> Quartz Hill School of Theology
>
> http://web.infoave.net/~jwest Biblical Studies Resources
> http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com Biblical Theology Weblog
___________________
In fairness to Wallace with, whom I don't always agree, this isn't called
eisegesis but the scientific method. You start with a hypothesis and
then you test it.
george
gfsomsel
___________
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list