[B-Greek] LXX Isaiah 43:1
Albert Pietersma
albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Mon Jan 12 00:23:43 EST 2004
Ziegler, incidentally, has the same punctuation as Rahlfs. You are
right about the punctuation. Cf. e.g Hosea 1.6: KALESON TO ONOMA AUTHS
OUK HLEHMENH. The punctuation, therefore, serves an interpretive
purpose. Both Rahlfs and Ziegler are saying by means of it that EMOS EI
SU is not a name.
It seems to me we have to go back to the source text and ask whether LY
)TH is a personal name. I would say No, because the Hebrew says: I
called you BY your name. Therefore, the sense of the Hebrew is: Since I
put my stamp on you, you belong to me.
Since there is no grammatical need to read the Greek differently, it
should be read the same. KALEW often takes a double accusative.
Al
On Jan 11, 2004, at 5:13 PM, donald larsen wrote:
> I have a question about the punctuation of the last clause in LXX
> Isaiah 43:1. Rahlfs reads: EKALESA SE TO ONOMA SOU, EMOS EI SU.
> This punctuation reads EMOS EI SU as a separate independent clause. I
> would translate, "I have called you by name, you are mine." This
> translation treats TO ONOMA SOU as an accusative of respect, and makes
> good sense to me.
>
> But what happens if the comma is not introduced? EKALESA SE TO ONOMA
> SOU EMOS EI SU. Could EMOS EI SU then be understood as a proper name?
> Translated something like, "I have named you: You are Mine."
>
> I'd appreciate your responses.
>
> Don Larsen
> Hartford Seminary
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
>
—
Albert Pietersma
Professor of Septuagint and Hellenistic Greek
Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations
University of Toronto
Home: 21 Cross Street,
Weston ON Canada M9N 2B8
Email: albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Homepage: http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~pietersm
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list