[B-Greek] Rev. 2:9
Dony K. Donev
dony at cupandcross.com
Sat Mar 20 09:49:35 EST 2004
I was more concerned with the fact that Stephanos & Scrivener use DE while
Byzantine Maj. and Alexandrian ALLA, then most versions have the statement
in parenthesis or italics which usually indicates later addition or
modification. Thanks for clearing it up.
Dony K. Donev
http://cupandcross.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl W. Conrad" <cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu>
To: "Dony K. Donev" <dony at cupandcross.com>
Cc: <B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Rev. 2:9
> At 12:51 AM -0500 3/20/04, Dony K. Donev wrote:
> >Should ALLA PLOUSIOUS EI be considered as authentic in this verse?
>
> Text: OIDA SOU THN QLIYIN KAI THN PTWCEIAN, ALLA PLOUSIOS EI, KAI THN
> BLASFHMIAN EK TWN LEGONTWN IOUDAIOUS EINAI hEAUTOUS KAI OUK EISIN ALLA
> SUNAGWGH TOU SATANA.
>
> There is absolutely no hint of a critical problem with this clause; if
> you're concerned that there's a contradiction between PTWCEIAN and
> PLOUSIOS, I would think that ALLA PLOUSIOS EI is meant to indicate
> spiritual wealth.
> --
>
> Carl W. Conrad
> Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
> 1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
> cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
> WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list