[B-Greek] TI in Gal 2.6

Steven Lo Vullo themelios at charter.net
Tue Nov 30 12:11:08 EST 2004


On Nov 30, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Steven Lo Vullo wrote:

> For example, note the ironic mistakes in both GNT and GNT-T in Gal 2.6 
> and Gal 6.3. In 2.6 we have an **intransitive** use of DOKEW followed 
> by a complementary EINAI and its predicate TI, where TI should be 
> tagged nominative but is tagged accusative by both GNT and GNT-T. But 
> in Gal 6.3 we have a **transitive** use of DOKEW followed by the 
> object clause EINAI TI MHDEN WN, where both TI and MHDEN should be 
> tagged accusative but both are tagged nominative in both GNT and 
> GNT-T! When we look at other examples where the predicate word is 
> unambiguous, it becomes apparent that this is backwards.

Actually, I am not only wrong here, but have contradicted what I have 
previously illustrated. The tagging in Gal 6.3 is correct, since the 
implied subject of EINAI is the same as the subject of DOKEI, as I have 
pointed out in a previous post. As Gilda Radner used to say: Nevermind!
============

Steven Lo Vullo
Madison, WI




More information about the B-Greek mailing list