[B-Greek] Romans 6:11 LOGIZESQE EAUTOUS

David Bielby dbielby at bloomingtonvineyard.org
Mon Aug 1 18:29:57 EDT 2005


Can someone refresh me on this construction?  Is there a grammatical rule
here?

 

LOGIZESQE EAUTOUS

 

All Zerwick says is that it is a 3rd plural for a 2nd. 

 

While I’m on this chapter I have another question about the term

ESOMEQA in Romans 6:5.  Zerwick cites a lesson dealing with

this term as a Future Participle.  Is this a future participle?  I have it

parsed as a Future Middle Indicative-can someone explain the 

significance of his reference there?  

 

Zerwick’s entry says  ‘ESOMEQA’ fut. EIMI  fut.  “Connoting ‘now that we are

baptized, we…”, logical rather than temporal (cf 5:19) Latin ed. 

 

and then cites a lesson on how the future participle dropped out of use by
and

large and that the question may be raised whether the present participle

may stand at times for the future.  However I don’t see a participle at all
here.

 

Is this an error is there something I’m missing in the comments?  He is very


brief and so maybe one of the big Greeks can illuminate me.  

 

Merci beaucoup!!

 

 

David Bielby

Pastor

HYPERLINK
"mailto:dbielby at bloomingtonvineyard.org"dbielby at bloomingtonvineyard.org

 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.8/61 - Release Date: 8/1/2005
 



More information about the B-Greek mailing list