[B-Greek] Aorist as an 'x' rather than a '.' (dot)
Jim West
jwest at highland.net
Mon Aug 1 18:45:01 EDT 2005
Carl W Conrad wrote:
> The only problem with this description is that it is only the
> INDICATIVE of the aorist that necessarily or normally concerns the
> past. Subjunctive, imperative, infinitive, and participle of the
> aorist do NOT necessarily refer to a past event.
Yes absolutely- I should have specified.
--
D. Jim West
Biblical Studies Resources - http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
Biblical Theology Weblog - http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list