[B-Greek] Aorist as an 'x' rather than a '.' (dot)

Jim West jwest at highland.net
Mon Aug 1 18:45:01 EDT 2005



Carl W Conrad wrote:

> The only problem with this description is that it is only the  
> INDICATIVE of the aorist that necessarily or normally concerns the  
> past. Subjunctive, imperative, infinitive, and participle of the  
> aorist do NOT necessarily refer to a past event.


Yes absolutely- I should have specified.

-- 
D. Jim West

Biblical Studies Resources -  http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
Biblical Theology Weblog -  http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com




More information about the B-Greek mailing list