[B-Greek] Colossians 2:8
Harold R. Holmyard III
hholmyard at ont.com
Tue Aug 9 13:44:48 EDT 2005
Dear Malcolm,
>BLEPETE MH TIS hUMAS ESTAI hO SULAGWGWN DIA THS FILOSOFIAS KAI KENHS
>APATAS KATA THN PARADOSIN TWN ANQROPWN KAI KATA TA STOICEIA TOU
>KOSMOU KAI OU KATA CRISTON.
>
>My question is a simple one. The position of hUMAS strikes me as
>quite awkard.
HH: You shouldn't judge Greek by English. Greek can do this, and the
writer may have wanted to link DIA THS FILOSOFIAS KAI KENHS APATAS
closely to the verb.
> It could be understood as the direct object of hO SULAGWGWN, but
>could it legitimately be by virtue of it's position in the text the
>accusative of respect? In other words I know it can but is it more
>probable and nature?
HH: If hUMas were an accusative of respect, I don't see that the
meaning would be any different than if hUMAS were the direct object
of the verb: "Beware lest anyone with respect to you be one deceiving
. . . ." A direct object is just more natural.
Yours,
Harold Holmyard
>
>Cordially,
>
>Malcolm Robertson
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>---
>B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
>B-Greek mailing list
>B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list