[B-Greek] which GNT?
Michael Hinton
guyanimal at mac.com
Thu Aug 25 12:38:32 EDT 2005
I am a baby NT Greek student (2 college semesters so far) but I love
this study and its ultimate goal: to clarify what the inspired NT
authors actually wrote as well as what they intended to convey.
Regarding the in-house debate: Wescott & Hort et. al. vs. Textus
Receptus. Both sides say the other's manuscripts have been either
corrupted, or lack substantial backing or have been intentionally
edited or revised.
My question is, what real evidences do we have to corroborate either
position? Is there a consensus aside from the fact that nearly all
modern translations rely on Nestle/UBS "critical text"?
Does this fact necessarily imply that the critical text sans apparatus,
is closer to the autographs?
ERRWSQE,
Michael Hinton
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list