[B-Greek] Greek Grammar in terms of Descriptive Linguistics?
Elizabeth Kline
kline-dekooning at earthlink.net
Sat Aug 27 20:09:42 EDT 2005
On Aug 27, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
> It is unquestionable true that traditional grammar doesn't
> adequately deal with many fundamental questions that should be
> raised about how Biblical Greek works. Much of the grammatical
> terminology is almost if not altogether worthless;
Yes, the metalanguage of traditional grammar reminds me of a 1950s
tourist trap in Northern California called the Winchester House. It
was an architectural monstrosity with closets only big enough for one
broom and staircases that led to nowhere.
I don't think we can talk about language without a metalanguage but
we can certainly improve on the traditional one which has been
developed haphazardly over centuries. No current linguist framework
covers all the bases so one is forced to adopt multiple frameworks
and multiple metalanguages to deal with semantics, syntax,
pragmatics ...
Elizabeth Kline
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list