[B-Greek] tongues - languages
Eric Weiss
papaweiss1 at yahoo.com
Thu May 26 10:46:27 EDT 2005
> In addition, the contexts which have been referenced in the last few post do not forbide a
> known tongue or language translation. Acts 2:4 says KAI WFQHSAN AUTOIS
> DIAMERIZOMENAI GLWSSAI WSEI PUROS KAI EKAQISEN EF hENA hEKASTON
> AUTWN...
>
> and
>
> The hETERAIS GLWSSAIS (v 4) in conjunction with HKOUON hEIS hEKASTON THi IDIAi
> DIALEKTWi LALOUNTWN AUTWN ...(v 6) coupled with vss 7and 8 should make it
> abundantly clear that this occurence was not the same as the other instances in Scripture.
>
> There is nothing to suggest that 1 Cor 12-14 is anything other than the reflection of the
> multilingual and very cosmopolitan makeup of Corinthian Church. Otherwise you would have
> the problem in Gen 11:9 (the very like problem of confusion, unitelligiblity) and the blindness > of the mystery religion's utter (heavenly sic) hogwash.
With regard to the Greek:
My studies of the Greek wording in Acts and I Corinthians have led me to conclude that one
cannot make a sharp distinction between what occurred in Acts 2 and in the other instances of
tongues-speaking in Acts, and what was occurring at Corinth. They may have been two
different kinds of tongues-speaking, but what I have concluded is that when one reads in the
Greek every passage in Acts that has to do with LALEIN GLWSSAIS (Pentecost, Cornelius,
Samaria, etc.), and all of I Corinthians 12-14, I find the language and wording too similar and
overlapping to support there being a clear difference based on the Greek.
Eric S. Weiss
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list