[B-Greek] Titus 1:6, not in accusation of what?

Harold R. Holmyard III hholmyard at ont.com
Fri Sep 2 12:10:48 EDT 2005


Dear Jeff,

>The practical upshot would be that Paul doesn't mean to suggest that 
>a mere (groundless) accusation regarding a man's children is 
>sufficient to disqualify him even with regard to profligacy. Both in 
>terms of profligacy and rebelliousness, it would be the actual 
>existence of the characteristic that would be disqualifying.


HH: Right, I never assumed that it was a groundless accusation. A 
groundless accusation can be made against anybody. BAGD translates 
KATHGORIA as "charge." No charge of profligacy should be able to be 
brought against them.

				Yours,
				Harold Holmyard



More information about the B-Greek mailing list