[B-Greek] accentuation of ERIQEIAI
Richard Ghilardi
qodeshlayhvh at juno.com
Mon Sep 19 11:39:34 EDT 2005
Hi Folks,
Hmmmmmmmmmm... This is most curious.
The TR and NA27 have the circumflex in both vss. WH has the acute twice,
but they spell it ERIQIAI rather than ERIQEIAI. GNT2 has the acute in
both vss. GNT3 corr. ed. has the circumflex in both vss. And GNT4, 2nd
print has the acute in Corinthians and the circumflex in Galatians. I
wonder what the most recent printing of GNT4, GNT1 and the pre-corrected
3rd edition show? I believe Rod Decker has these volumes.
Rod?
Yours in His grace,
Richard Ghilardi - qodeshlayhvh at juno.com
New Haven, Connecticut USA
===============================================
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:05:13 +0800 James Tauber <jtauber at jtauber.com>
writes:
> In some editions I have, ERIQEIAI in 2 Cor 12.20 and Gal 5.20 is
> accented as a paroxytone: ERIQEI/AI
>
> I thought this would have been prohibited on the basis of long
> penults not taking acute when the ultima is short (taking final AI
> to
> be short here).
>
> Am I correct in thinking it should be properispomenon ERIQEI=AI in
>
> both verses?
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list