[B-Greek] ECOMEN or ECWMEN - Rom. 5.1
Ron Fay
roncfay at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 8 11:41:32 EDT 2006
I believe he is taking the subjunctive as hortatory. He mistates himself
since there is no 1st plural imperative form per se. Admittedly, he states
in his commentary that this is a possibility (which I believe is wrong), but
I think he is mistating himself. Also, Wright does believe it should be
understood as indicative (Romans, 515).
He points to Moo (Romans, 295-6) as support for the imperatival reading, but
Moo takes it as a hortatory subjunctive as well.
- Ron
________________________________________________
Ron Fay
www.roncfay.com
Ph. D. candidate in New Testament
An Editor of Trinity Journal
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Deerfield, IL.
roncfay at hotmail.com
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list