[B-Greek] 1 Corinthians 7:8-9
Elliot Poe
Elliot.Poe at gmail.com
Thu Dec 7 21:47:39 EST 2006
Good point. I guess it is a comparative clause within a simple
condition, which might answer my question. It could be read as follows:
EAN MENOUSIN hWS K'AGW [MENW] . . .
This would then leave us to fill in the blanks with the words you
suggested: AGAMOS, XHROS, or MONOS. I suppose this is where we leave
grammar and go to the greater context, as you suggested.
Thanks,
Elliot Poe
George F Somsel wrote:
> Comparative clause? How so? I think it is a simple condition "If X,
> then Y." Read the sentence as reorganized slightly omitting the
> bracketted section..
>
> [LEGW DE TOIS AGAMOIS KAI TAIS XHRAIS] EAN MENOUSIN hWS K'AGW, KALOS
> AUTOIS.
>
>
>
> george
> gfsomsel
> _________
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Elliot Poe <Elliot.Poe at gmail.com>
> To: George F Somsel <gfsomsel at yahoo.com>
> Cc: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2006 9:11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [B-Greek] 1 Corinthians 7:8-9
>
> Thanks for your input, George. To follow up: why would nouns be
> preferable over a verb? I assumed this was a comparative clause with
> the verb omitted.
>
> Thanks again,
> Elliot Poe
>
> George F Somsel wrote:
>
> > Definitely not EGKRATEUOMAI. There are two options: AGAMOS and XHROS
> > (uncommon masc form of XHRA). I would opt for AGAMOS.
> >
> > george
> > gfsomsel
> > _________
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Elliot Poe <Elliot.Poe at gmail.com>
> > To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2006 8:31:40 PM
> > Subject: [B-Greek] 1 Corinthians 7:8-9
> >
> > What do you think the ellipsis that results from hWS KAGW in the
> > following quote refers to?
> >
> > LEGW DE TOIS AGAMOIS KAI TAIS CHRAIS, KALON AUTOIS EAN MEINWSIN hWS
> > KAGW: EI DE OUK EGKRATEUONTAI . . .
> >
> > Many modern translations seem to fill the ellipsis with "unmarried," but
> > this seems unsatisfactory to me (mainly because this is one of the two
> > classes mentioned at the beginning of the verse). I think the ellipsis
> > demands a verb. The most likely candidate appears to be the understood
> > EIMI (an ellipsis in itself), but I am also wondering if the understood
> > verb could be EGKRATEUOMAI.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Elliot Poe
> > ---
> > B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> > B-Greek mailing list
> > B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
> >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=41244/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers
> <http://answers.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx>
> and get answers from real people who know.
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list