[B-Greek] Acts 2:46
George F Somsel
gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 18 08:20:48 EST 2006
That OIKOS can be used for hIERON is not disputable, but that it is so used here is a different question. It would appear that you are neglecting the force of the particle TE. KLWNTES TE KAT' OIKON ARTON is not an appositive to PROSKARTEROUNTES OMOQUMADON. Rather it is TE . . . TE, i.e. there are ** BOTH ** PROSKARTEROUNTES and KLWNTES ARTON. Thus, two different actions are in view.
Note the KAQ' hHMERAN at the beginning of the verse. This is a distributive usage indicating "from day to day" or daily. This is similarly used in regard to the breaking of bread (Which could either be taken as a sharing of meals or as a celebration of the Eucharist). This is done "from house to house" or distributively.
george
gfsomsel
_________
----- Original Message ----
From: Curtis Hinson <curtis at curtishinson.com>
To: B-Greek <B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:55:06 AM
Subject: [B-Greek] Acts 2:46
Recently I was working in Acts and ran across this:
2:46 καθ ημεραν τε προσκαρτερουντες ομοθυμαδον εν τω ιερω κλωντες τε κατ
οικον αρτον μετελαμβανον τροφης εν αγαλλιασει και αφελοτητι καρδιας
KAQ HMERAN TE PROSKARTEROUNTES OMOQUMADON EN TW IERW KLWNTES TE KAT
OIKON ARTON METELAMBANON TROFHS EN AGALLIASEI AFELOTHTI KARDIAS
My working translation so far is something like:
Each day they were devoted as with a single mind in the Temple, breaking
bread in the house, sharing food with exultation and sincerity in their
hearts
I looked at a spectrum of translations and they seem to take the
devotion going on in the first part of the sentence to be in the temple
courts, and the breaking of bread in the second part to be "at home" or
"in their homes" or NKJV even says "house to house." I assume NKJV took
KAT to be working with OIKON in this way.
My question here partly regards the use of the accusative singular
OIKON, which I'd expect to be plural and maybe some extra words if it
were functioning in the way most of the translations have it. That of
course calls into question the function of TE here, which Friberg
considers to mean and, likewise, or so in it's use in 2.40.
So why is it again that OIKON is not a reference to IERW since it's
singular? I thought maybe OIKON was another way of referring to IERW,
so that the breaking of bread as well as the devotion is still going on
in the temple courts. And what about KAT here, since we're in the
accusative, wouldn't it be something like:
...breaking bread throughout the house...
or even
...breaking the house-bread throughout...
Any insights on that? Any precedents come to mind either way?
Bless the Name
Curtis Hinson
http://curtishinson.com
http://adfontes.ath.cx
--
My local weather at the time of this email:
49F (9C), Overcast
Server status:
06:24:01 up 107 days, 5:10, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.15, 0.11
---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list