[B-Greek] John 3:29 hO hESTHKWS KAI AKOUWN
Richard Lindeman
oblchurch at msn.com
Wed Dec 20 10:23:57 EST 2006
From: "Richard Lindeman" <oblchurch at msn.com>
To: <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: B-Greek Digest, Vol 48, Issue 20
Carl & Elizabeth:
Thanks, this is very helpful to me. "The one who is now standing and
hearing" makes good sense to me. It isn't that the perfect hESTHKWS
functions as exactly the equivalent of a present here, but rather that it
retains its perfect aspect while it expresses its root meaning in present
time statively. However, now I am tempted to translate this phrase: "The
one who is now standing and always hearing" in order to distinguish between
the aspects. Am I going too far with this?
Thanks!
Rich Lindeman
>
>>Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:18:55 -0500
>>From: "Carl W. Conrad" <cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu>
>>Subject: Re: [B-Greek] John 3:29 hO hESTHKWS KAI AKOUWN
>>To: Elizabeth Kline <kline_dekooning at earthlink.net>
>>Cc: greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
>>Message-ID: <98732C01-5A34-4785-B678-5431FEDDB5C3 at artsci.wustl.edu>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>>On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Elizabeth Kline wrote:
>
>>
>> Carl,
>>
>> Is intransitive perfect hO hESTHKWS stative or imperfective?
>
>>I guess the proper word is "stative." Is EIMI existential stative? I
>>think that hO hESTHKWS means "the one who is now standing," hESTHKA
>>means "I am now standing" (= "I have risen to my feet" or "I have
>>come to a halt."
>>
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list