[B-Greek] Acts 22:17 Septuagintal?
Elizabeth Kline
kline-dekooning at earthlink.net
Thu Jan 26 12:24:46 EST 2006
On Jan 25, 2006, at 3:21 PM, <randallbuth at gmail.com>
<randallbuth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, the LXX does beg for a contrary example buried somewhere.
> However, even
> if one were found it would not affect the Luke/Acts data. That side
> of the
> equation is quite limited and easy to follow.
I spent some time looking for a counter example limiting my search to
KAI EGENETO with an infinitive in the LXX. This construction in the
vast majority of cases uses the phrase EN TWi + infinitive which
describes the attendant circumstances relative to the main verbal
idea. I found some odd examples but no direct counter examples. In NO
case did the infinitive function as the main verb where KAI EGENETO
introduced a narrative event. And even if one or two examples could
be found it would not qualify it as a characteristic construction in
LXX greek. At this point I am willing to agree with Dr. Buth that
Acts 22:17 is not septuagintal.
Elizabeth Kline
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list