[B-Greek] 1 Pet. 3:21 syntax
Kimmo Huovila
kimmo.huovila at helsinki.fi
Mon Jul 17 08:33:34 EDT 2006
Are you saying that BAPTISMA is the subject of SWiZEI and ANTITUPON is a
predicate of BAPTISMA?
The referent of hO is not so interesting at the moment as its syntactic
relationship to ANTITUPON and BAPTISMA. (It more likely refers to the whole
event of the preceding verse or water, as KIBWTOS is feminine, but this is
beside the question.)
Kimmo Huovila
On Monday July 17 2006 14:33, George F Somsel wrote:
> hO is a relative neuter PN and refers back to KIBWTOU in the preceding verse
BAPTISMA is the subject "which is a correspondent [ANTITUPON] to" KIBWTOU.
The comparison is thus made between baptism and entering into the ark.
>
> ___________
>
>
> Kimmo Huovila <kimmo.huovila at helsinki.fi> wrote:
> What is the syntactic relationship between hO, ANTITUPON, and BAPTISMA in
> 1. Pet. 3:21?
>
> hO KAI hUMAS ANTITUPON NUN SWiZEI BAPTISMA, OU SARKOS APOQESIS hRUPOU ALLA
> SUNEIDHSEWS AGAQHS EPERWTHMA.
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list