[B-Greek] Romans 4:1
Craig J
newsgroupstuff at gmail.com
Wed Jul 26 09:57:54 EDT 2006
> This is clearly a case of indirect discourse. In indirect
> discourse the dependent clause is set with its verb in the
> infinitive and, if different than the main verb, the
> subject in the accustive.
So wouldn't that indicate ABRAAM/TON PROPATORA as the subject of the
infinitive?
While I'm at it, can I ask, is it possible for KATA SARKA to be modifying
either PROPATORA or hEURHKENAI?
BTW I also notice there is a textual variant on the location of hEURHKENAI.
Would its location influence how you might tend to translate that verse?
--
Craig Johnson
Brisbane, Australia
Blog Experiment: http://bloggledegook.blogspot.com/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list