[B-Greek] Potential Opt. Acts 17:18

George F Somsel gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 18 14:09:04 EDT 2006


Glad to oblige regarding Robertson.  I quote only the section dealing with hOUTOS as derogatory

 
2. The Contemptuous Use of hOUTOS. It is merely one variation of the purely deictic idiom due to the relation of the persons in question. It is rather common in the N. T. So in Mt. 26:61 hOUTOS EFH we find a “fling” of reproach as the witnesses testify against Jesus. Cf. Mt. 26:71 (parallel Lu. 22:56 KAI hOUTOS), the maid about Peter; Mk. 2:7, the Pharisees about Jesus; Lu. 15:2; Jo. 6:42; 9:24; 12:34; Ac. 7:40, Jews about Moses; 19:26; 28:4, about Paul; Lu. 15:30, the elder son at the younger; 18:11, the Pharisee at the publican, etc. A striking example occurs in Ac. 5:28.

Robertson, A. (1919; 2006). A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (697). Logos.

 
george
gfsomsel
_________



----- Original Message ----
From: Iver Larsen <iver_larsen at sil.org>
To: BG <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:18:13 PM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Potential Opt. Acts 17:18


Thanks for the quote. I don't have a copy of either Parsons/Culy or Wallace, but I do have BDF.

Based on this brief quote, it looks like Wallace is overstating the case in the first paragraph above. The second 
paragraph (except the last sentence) is incorrect according to my research.
BDF does say in 290.6 quote:
"hOUTOS appears to be used in a contemptuous sense of a person present: Lk 15:30."
Note the word "appears". I don't think BDF has adequately researched the function of word order in terms of the meaning 
of hOUTOS.

I agree with George that the contempt in Lk 15:30 is not shown by the use of hOUTOS, but by the older brother referring 
to his younger brother as "this son of yours". (And the younger brother is not present).

BDF gives two more references:
Lk 18:11 hOUTOS hO TELWNHS
Here hOUTOS is fronted and thereby marks a contrast between "this tax collector" and the speaker. As I said when hOUTOS 
is fronted it may well carry a derogatory sense.
The other reference in BDF is Acts 17:18 which we have already dealt with.
BDF gives a reference to Rob. 697-706, but I don't have a copy of Robertson.

Concerning Acts 6:13,14 and 19:26 the situation is different.
19:26 hO PAULOS hOUTOS
6:13 hO ANQRWPOS hOUTOS - no contempt signified by hOUTOS
6:14 IHSOUS hO NAZARAIOS hOUTOS

I am happy to accept that when hOUTOS is used with a proper name, contempt is indicated, because the demonstrative 
function of hOUTOS is superfluous with proper name.

Iver Larsen 

---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek




More information about the B-Greek mailing list