[B-Greek] The Genealogy of Jesus in Luke 3
Roger Hutchinson
roger.hutchinson at comcast.net
Wed Sep 13 18:10:37 EDT 2006
Marshal is intersting. Is there a rule governing the use of the article
in Greek? When does it modify the following noun and when would it
refer back to the preceding noun. Is there a rule governing this, and
are there examples of this use in non-Biblical documents that might
apply in this situation?
Roger Hutchinson
Elizabeth Kline wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Elizabeth Kline wrote:
>
>> The reading that attempts to link IHSOUS directly to HLI, with the
>> comment about IWSHF as a parenthesis, sounds to me like exegesis
>> driven by a need to prove something.
>
>
> OK, this statement should be supported.
>
> LK3:23 KAI AUTOS HN IHSOUS ARCOMENOS hWSEI ETWN TRIAKONTA, WN hUIOS,
> hWS ENOMIZETO, IWSHF TOU HLI ...
>
> Marshal (p.163) "The omission of the article before IWSHF led Godet
> to the view that the whole phrase hWS ENOMIZETO IWSHF as a
> parenthesis, so that Jesus was presented as the son of Eli ...".
> Marshal considers this is a misunderstanding of the function of TOU.
> He reads TOU as appositional to the preceding noun, not the article
> for the following noun. On this reading there is no missing TOU. "...
> so that the structure is: 'Jesus was the son ... of Joseph (who was)
> the (son) of Eli (who was) the (son) of ...'".
>
> I am certain that someone will take exception to this but keep in
> mind you are arguing with I.H.Marshall no with E.Kline :-)
>
> Elizabeth Kline
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list