[B-Greek] Col1:6,9: AF hHS hHMERAS
Elizabeth Kline
kline_dekooning at earthlink.net
Fri Apr 6 00:28:06 EDT 2007
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Stephen Baldwin wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
> I was wondering whether anyone could provide some information or
> references
> on the above construction.
> Zerwick/Grosvenor (GAGNT) say that it is a shortened form of
> APO THS hHMERAS hHi
> and provide no further information.
>
> Murray Harris says that it is an idiomatic form of AF hHMERAS hHi
> where the
> dative singular rel. pronoun hHi has been attracted to the case of its
> antecedent and the result of that in turn transferred to the relative
> clause.
> This is at least an explanation of sorts but leaves one thirsting
> for more.
>
> There seems to be an awful lot of attraction going on -- and being
> morphologically-minded, I'd like to know more. If there's anything
> out there
> that will shed more light on attraction in general (err in a
> linguistic
> context :-)), I'd be curious to read more...
>
> Thanks
> Stephen Baldwin
Stephen,
I will not respond to M.Culy's post since it was intended to be OFFLIST.
Guy Cooper has some things to say about AF hHS hHMERAS and the notion
of attraction. In Attic Syntax 1.51.10.0 Cooper states:
"A relative sentence functions in many ways as a syntactic complex
equivalent to an adjective. Often such a relative sentence is thought
of as being as a whole in agreement with a substantive, whether noun,
pronoun or substantivization. The case of the relative then has,
against the general rule, no regard for its function within its one
(relative) sentence. ... At first glance it seems that the relative
has been drawn into the case of its antecedent, and it is only upon
reflection and with practiced stylist perception that it appears that
the relative is agreeing with the syntactic function of its relative
sentence as a whole, the phenomenon is often spoken of as
attraction ... it is more accurate to speak of the relative as
assimilating ... to the case function of its sentence."
The portion above was quoted to provide Cooper's framework for his
reading of AF hHS hHMERAS which he does NOT consider as falling
within his definition of assimilation.
Cooper 1.51.10.3
"The prepositional phrase AF hHS used after a form of hHMERA is a
dating formula which need not be closely analyzed as an example of
assimilation. It is comparable on the one hand to various semi-
ellipses of hHMERA and the feminine used adverbially without
ellipse ... "
I need to spend more time thinking about this, but it appears from
the examples given in Cooper showing AF hHS used with a form of
hHMERA, that the word order found in Col. 1:6,9 is attested in
Demosthenes 9:19 AF hHS hHMERAS, 18:26 AF hHS ... hHMERAS. Cooper
takes no special interest in this word order, he lists it right along
with citations for hHMERAi AP hHS. The way I am reading Cooper (could
be wrong!) he sees AF hHS as a syntactic functional unit (quoting
again) "The prepositional phrase AF hHS used after a form of hHMERA
is a dating formula which need not be closely analyzed as an example
of assimilation."
Anyway, something to think about.
Elizabeth Kline
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list