[B-Greek] Second attempt - On Aspect

Mitch Larramore mitchlarramore at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 27 17:51:08 EDT 2007


Dr. Porter has a section on Aorist for timeless
action, and includes these two examples:

Mk 1.11
SU EI hO hUIOS MOU hO AGAPHTOS, EN SOI EUDOKHSA

Lk 7.35
EDIKAIWQH hH SOFIA APO PANTWN TWN TEKNWN AUTHS


After reading these, it occurred to me that a Present
Tense may not have been aspectual appropriate for the
point the writer is making. He did not want to
communicate an Imperfective aspect in the statement.

How would a Greek make a statement, referencing the
present/current time, but wanting to do so without the
accompanying Imperfective Aspect that a Present Tense
would bring? It seems to me that the Aorist in these
two examples was somewhat needed due to the desired
Perfective aspect. (In the archives, some argue that
such statements as these are not of a temporal
nature.)


Mitch Larramore
Sugar Land, Texas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the B-Greek mailing list