[B-Greek] hO KAI EPOIHSA? (Acts 26:10)

Eric Inman eric.inman at wescorpflex.com
Tue Dec 11 19:51:59 EST 2007


Could PRAXAI be the antecedent of hO?

Eric Inman

-----Original Message-----
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Webb Mealy
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:41 PM
To: 'Biblical Greek'
Subject: [B-Greek] hO KAI EPOIHSA? (Acts 26:10)

Acts 26:9-10 reads,

 

EGW MEN OUN EDOXA EMAUTWi PROS TO ONOMA IHSOU TOU N. DEIN POLLA ENANTIA
PRAXAI, hO KAI EPOIHSA EN hIEROSOLUMOIS.

 

Indeed, I myself was convinced that I ought to do many things against the
name of Jesus of Nazareth. And that is what I did in Jerusalem.(NRSV)

 

BDF classifies the hO in hO KAI EPOIHSA as "'a relative connective' (i.e. a
loosening of the connection of the relative clause to the preceding complex
sentence), something intermediate between a relative clause and a
demonstrative clause" (BDF para. 458, pp. 240f.). Zerwick-Grosvenor renders
POLLA ENANTIA PRAXAI of v. 9 as "to put up strong opposition". If that is
truly how a Koine Greek speaker would read the expression, does that qualify
hO (in place of hA) as a constructio ad sensum? If so, is that a
conflicting, complementary, useful or useless analysis in relation to that
of BDF? 

 

Obviously real Koine Greek speakers didn't have any particular problem with
hO following POLLA, or there would have been a texual variant there. Or is
hO resuming PRAXAI??

 

Webb Mealy


  _____  

I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 6101 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len>  for free now!

---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek





More information about the B-Greek mailing list