[B-Greek] 2 Peter 3:9
Elizabeth Kline
kline_dekooning at earthlink.net
Fri Dec 14 15:00:56 EST 2007
On Dec 14, 2007, at 7:12 AM, Rod Rogers wrote:
> 2 Peter 3:9
>
> OU BRADUNEI KURIOS THS EPAGGELIAS
>
> hWS TINES BRADUTHTA hHGOUNTAI
>
> ALLA
>
> MAKROQUMEI EIS hUMAS
>
> MH BOULOMENOS TINAS APOLESQAI
>
> ALLA
>
> PANTAS EIS METANOIAN CWRHSAI.
>
>
>
> I understand this verse to have two
> independent clauses and three dependent
> clauses. The subject of the sentence is
> KURIOS and I suppose there are two main
> points of the verse in light of the finite
> verbs, the Lord is not slow and He is
> patient. I see the hWS clause as a
> comparative clause, comparing the ungodly
> which say where is his coming to the Lord
> Himself.
>
> I understand KURIOS to be the understood
> subject of the third clause MAKROQUMEI EIS
> hUMAS. My questions pertain to the last two
> clauses. Are MH BOULOMENOS TINAS APOLESQAI
> and PANTAS EIS METANOIAN CWRHSAI adverbial
> clauses and if so would you diagrammatically
> continue to place them under EIS hUMAS or
> would you place them separately under
> MAKROQUMEI (I would not place them under EIS
> hUMAS)? Point being, does hUMAS govern the
> extent/content of TINAS OR PANTAS in any way
> (I don't think so)? Could MH BOULOMENOS TINAS
> APOLESQAI stand on it's own with KURIOS as
> the implied subject and ESTIN as the implied
> verb? Anything else I'm missing?
See UBS3 and NA27 for the textual var. EIS hUMAS, DI' hUMAS, EIS hHMAS.
R.Bauckham (2Pet Jude WBC p.313) " ... PANTAS is clearly limited by
hUMAS. There is no thought here of christian mission ... ".
There is a tendency to level out the meaning of similar expressions
in NT so that they all mean more or less the same thing. The referent
of hUMAS is the recipients of the letter. Backham takes this as a
warning to the recipients of the letter not as a general statement
about divine forbearance. "Here it is for the sake of the repentance
of 2Peter's christian readers." The people in view are those who have
been lead astray by false teachers.
Doubtless we could find more general statements about divine
forbearance which would have a broad scope but the task at hand is to
determine what 2Peter is saying to the target audience. Bauckham
mentions a noteworthy rabbinical controversy (R.Eliezer b. Hyrcanus
vs. R.Joshua b. Hananiah) concerning the delay of redemption that
might (late 1st cent.??) have formed a background for 2Peter's
discussion of the delay of the parousia. It might be assumed that
2Peter target readership might draw a more general inference from a
statement specifically addressed to them.
This sort of question IS actually a language issue because in the
cognitive approach to semantics the cognitive framework of the
recipient plays the major role in assigning meaning to an utterance.
Elizabeth Kline
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list