[B-Greek] Eph 2:2 and syntactic significance of TOU PNEUMATOS
Brian Abasciano
bvabasciano at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 08:44:38 EST 2007
Yes, but Wallace seems to go that route largely because he believes that the genitive of apposition cannot occur with two personal nouns. Do you think he is right in that reasoning?
God bless,
Brian Abasciano
----- Original Message -----
From: kgraham0938 at comcast.net
To: Bryant J. Williams III ; Brian Abasciano ; b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Eph 2:2 and syntactic significance of TOU PNEUMATOS
I think the big deal is that Wallace does not take PNEUMATOS to be personal but rather an internal attitude. So it would not make sense to say
"the ruler... who is the attitude working in the sons of disobediance."
--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 at comcast.net
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list