[B-Greek] Eph 2:2 and syntactic significance of TOU PNEUMATOS

Brian Abasciano bvabasciano at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 08:44:38 EST 2007


Yes, but Wallace seems to go that route largely because he believes that the genitive of apposition cannot occur with two personal nouns. Do you think he is right in that reasoning? 

God bless,

Brian Abasciano
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: kgraham0938 at comcast.net 
  To: Bryant J. Williams III ; Brian Abasciano ; b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 8:26 AM
  Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Eph 2:2 and syntactic significance of TOU PNEUMATOS


  I think the big deal is that Wallace does not take PNEUMATOS to be personal but rather an internal attitude.  So it would not make sense to say

  "the ruler... who is the attitude working in the sons of disobediance."
  --
  Kelton Graham 
  KGRAHAM0938 at comcast.net



More information about the B-Greek mailing list