[B-Greek] Accusative of retained object
Bert de Haan
b_dehaan at sympatico.ca
Tue May 22 19:28:51 EDT 2007
Iver Larsen wrote;
>-------------------------------------
>Iver Larsen now adds a second thought and more details about objects,
>indirect objects and passives.
>
>Entrust is like "give" and a few other verbs semantically trivalent and
>grammatically ditransitive,
>so let me use "give" as an example to illustrate:
>
>Active: God gave the Scriptures to the Jews (= God gave the Jews the
>Scriptures)
>This construction semantically has an agent, patient and
>beneficiary/receiver. Grammatically it has
>a subject, an object and an indirect object.
>
>Because it is ditransitive, it can be made into a passive in two ways:
>
>1. Object-to-subject passivization: The Scriptures were given to the Jews
>(by God)
>2. IndirectObject-to-subject passivization: The Jews were given the
>Scriptures (by God)
>
[snip]
.........
........
And
>In Romans 3:2 we find a PT2 which gives us:
>EPISTEUQHSAN TA LOGIA TOU QEOU
>(the Jews) were entrusted (with) the word(s) of God (by God)
>(If English requires a "with" here, that is a peculiarity that is of no
>consequence for the
>analysis. TA LOGIA TOU QEOU is the object for EPISTEUQHSAN).
>
I guess English doesn't require "with" but it is more natural with it.
If instead of EPISTEUQHSAN Rom. 3:2 had read EDOQHSAN I would probably
have read this verse without even a hickup. Entrust is almost a compound
verb (entrust-with) and it is this "with" that threw me off.
Bert de Haan
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list