[B-Greek] DEIKNUMI: 2S endings variation
Carl Conrad
cwconrad2 at mac.com
Tue Apr 1 05:06:54 EDT 2008
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:07 PM, Carlton Winbery wrote:
>> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>> A quick-and-easy question if I may, in the interests of exactness:
>> 1. I note from Smyth s418 that 2S-P-A-I of DEIKNUMI is DEIKNUS.
>> 2. Mounce BBG p364 listing his athematic paradigms, has the same
>> being DEIKNUEIS
>> 3. Mounce MBG p308 v-3c(2) notes also that athematic DEIKNUMI has a
>> thematic variation, DEIKNUW.
>>
>> Is it reasonable to assume that for the athematic conjugation, Smyth
>> is correct and that Mounce has, in the instance of 2S-P-A-I,
>> introduced the thematic form in his athematic conjugation?
>>
>> Rgds
>> Stephen Baldwin
>> stbaldwi at hotmail.com
>>
> Steve,
>
> In John 2:18 the second sing. form is DEIKNUEIS, but in Acts 18:28
> the second sing. is EPIDEIKNUS. There is both a MI form and a W form.
To explain a little more fully, the older -MI verbs were beginning to
become standardized as -W verbs; the -NUMI verbs did this first and
were becoming -NUW verbs; another common -MI verb that was changing is
AFIHMI, for which we see numerous forms in the GNT that are based on
AFIW conjugation.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list