[B-Greek] LXX grammar question of Isaiah 44:22, 57:21
Albert Pietersma
albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Sun Apr 6 10:25:19 EDT 2008
As I see it, John raises two questions: (1) Since MT has a noun why
doesn't the Greek have a noun? and (2) Does XAIREIN make sense in the
context?
Though in the more isomorphic translations in the LXX, Heb verb = Gk
verb and Heb noun = Heb noun (etc.) with painful consistency, one
would not expect that to be the case in Gk-Isaiah.
As to whether XAIREIN makes sense in the context of 48:22——that
depends on how one reads the context.
Since in Greek-Isaiah both EIRHNH and XARA are used as glosses for
ShaLOM, either was an option in 48:12. (We can leave out of
consideration here just what role 48:22 plays in relation to what
precedes. Does it close 20-21 or does it underscore a larger segment
of what precedes?)
Had G opted for EIRHNH he would have read the context (larger or
smaller) as being about 'peace' (or lack thereof) in distinction from
'war'. That is how NRSV reads it. Had G opted for XARA he would have
read the context as being about 'joy' (or lack thereof) in
distinction from 'sadness'. G takes the latter route, and I can see
no problem with that (cf. EUPhROSUNH in v. 20).
However, G is apparently not content with saying that, according to
the Lord, the impious are without joy, but rather that, given that
the Lord has shown himself to be a rescuer (v. 20), there is no
reason for the impious 'to whoop it up'. Thus they have nothing to
rejoice about.
Since nouns are marked for aspect he opts for a verbal noun, which
allows him to mark for aspect. As a result NETS (Silva) translates
aptly: "There is no rejoicing," says the Lord, "for the impious."
Al
On Apr 5, 2008, at 8:27 PM, John Butzu wrote:
>
> Greetings! A while back I happened to stumble across your website and
> now I seem to have a question that perhaps someone with more years of
> Koine Greek could help me with. Here is the question: In Isaiah
> 44:22
> & 57:21 the same greek word is used (in the LXX) to translate the
> Hebrew word "Shalom" meaning peace or wholeness. The word used is
> chairo (CHAIRW) which is a verb. I checked the hebrew and sure
> enough the word shalom
> here is a noun. Why didn't this word get translated as CHARA (Joy)
> rather than CHAIRW (rejoice, be glad) for this does not even make
> sense
> when you read this passage! Is this just a mistake on the part of
> some tired scribe or am I missing something here in the grammar?
>
> Comments, questions, answers welcome!
>
>
>
> By John Mark
>
> New Testament and Bible Student/Pastor/Scholar
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Pack up or back up–use SkyDrive to transfer files or keep extra
> copies. Learn how.
> hthttp://www.windowslive.com/skydrive/overview.html?
> ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_skydrive_packup_042008
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list