[B-Greek] OUK ESTIN POIHSAI AUTON, Isaiah 48 and emotive level.

Albert Pietersma albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Sun Apr 6 23:22:40 EDT 2008


On Apr 6, 2008, at 3:18 PM, George F Somsel wrote:

> A look at the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsa) from the DSS reveals that  
> there is a mater present in SHALOM.  It might have been possible  
> that the translator had a similar text.
>
BHS lists no variant for MT's SHALOM. What does 1QIsa have if not  
SHALOM?

> Knowing how literal the LXX translation can be at times,
>
That is not apt for Gk-Isaiah

> it may be that he read it as an inf absolute of the verb SHLM which  
> would yield the translation we find.
>
But is the inf. absolute ever used with )YN? If not, it would seem  
most unlikely G would have read it so.
Al

>
>
> george
> gfsomsel
>
>
>
> … search for truth, hear truth,
> learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth,
> defend the truth till death.
>
>
>
> - Jan Hus
> _________
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Randall Buth <randallbuth at gmail.com>
> To: greek B-Greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2008 2:34:13 PM
> Subject: [B-Greek] OUK ESTIN POIHSAI AUTON, Isaiah 48 and emotive  
> level.
>
> The discussion on Isaih 48 touches on an interesting side of Greek,
> getting the strength and emotive level correct.
>
> The idiom is OUK ESTIN + [POIHSAI] ME (aparemfatos/infinitive).
> there is no way for me 'to do', which I read as a strong statement.
>
> Conrad:
>
>> "It is impossible for the unrighteous to be happy/glad."
>> NEVERTHELESS, I don't think that the LXX translator has erred; if the
>> Hebrew formulation of the proposition is,
>> "There is no sense of well- being for the unrighteous,"
>>
>>
> Silva (referenced by Pietersma)
>
>> "There is no rejoicing," says the Lord, "for the impious."
>>
>
> Carl's first line above expresses what I have just been
> writing into a drill for some of our summer pedagogy.
>
> In preparing material for a papyri (152BCE) written by an exasperated
> brother and business partner who was about to go bankrupt I want
> students to be able to say "there's no way I could/would come"
>
> The business partner said:
> OUK ESTIN ANAKUPSAI ME
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἀνακύψαι με.
> "there is no way for me to raise my head (in the city)."
> apparently with not a little emotion.
>
> It is a simple and seemingly colloquial idiom with some 'punch'.
> I want students to be able to say the following
> while pointing at an appropriate doer:
> (that is, they must point to the 'you' if they say "no way you can  
> come!"
> or another verb in another situation.)
> (but they are NOT to say the English, or even bother to think it  
> through.
> It is given here for the internet. things like this are
> to be spoken in Greek.)
>
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN ME
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν με.              there is no  
> way for me to come.
>
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN SE
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> σε.                                    ... you to come.
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN AUTON
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> αὐτόν.                                ... him to come.
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN AUTOUS
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> αὐτούς.                              ... them to come.
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN HMAS
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> ἡμᾶς.                                  ... us to come.
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN UMAS
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> ὑμᾶς.                                ... you to come.
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN AUTHN
> οὐκ ἔστιν ἐλθεῖν  
> αὐτήν.                                ... me to come.
> (And depending on the context, other verbs, too, and acted
> out if in a live skit.)
>
> Anyway it's an easy idiom to learn to use.
>
> One question that could arise from this is whether we are
> seeing this same idiom at Isaiah 48:22 where the persons
> are expressed as dotike [dative]  'beneficiaries' rather than
> aitiatike [accusative] 'doers'.
> Is it the same emotive "there's no way!" that Apollonios was
> telling off his brother Ptolemaios in 152 BCE?
>
> Well, I think that a 'strong reading' is a more probable reading of
> Greek Is 48.22, than a flat statement:  'there is no rejoicing for
> the impious'.
>
> ESTIN with a DOTIKH dative is common in Greek and I've
> seen datives override infinitives as almost-subjects (though I can't
> think of an example off the top of my head). Plus, the Hebrew
> source already provides a strong enough explanation about
> why a translator would choose a DOTIKH instead of an
> AITIATIKH here.
>
> And when I say emotive, I don't mean only with a raised voice
> and excitement, I would also include strong denial.
> Can you come to the SUMPOSION Friday evening?
> OUK ESTIN ELQEIN ME.  There's no way I can come. Not
> emotional, but unequivocally no. "Definitely not."
>
>
> ERRWSQE
>
> -- 
> Randall Buth, PhD
> www.biblicalulpan.org
> randallbuth at gmail.com
> Biblical Language Center
> Learn Easier - Progress Further - Remember for Life
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
>
>        
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of  
> Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>




More information about the B-Greek mailing list