[B-Greek] Matt 5.32 is part missing? Updated
Mitch Larramore
mitchlarramore at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 11 10:15:23 EDT 2008
Elizabeth
My question has nothing to do with the exception
clause. Please reread my question.
n Mar 10, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Mitch Larramore wrote:
>
> > EGW DE LEGW hUMIN hOTI PAS hO APOLUWN THN GUNAIKA
> > AUTOU PAREKTOS LOGOU PORNEIAS POIEI AUTHN
> MOICEUQHNAI
> > KAI hOS EAN APOLELUMENHN GAMHSHi MOICATAI
> >
> > I think what this says is that if a man divorces
> his
> > wife (by virtue of the exception clause here, the
> > implication would be that he divorces his wife for
> > unlawful reasons) he causes her to commit
> adultery.
> > So, my question is this: is there an assumption
> that
> > she will commit adultery UPON REMARRYING or does
> the
> > divorced status itself qualify her to be an
> adulteress?
>
> I do not see how this question can be answered
> within the published b-
> greek guidelines for topicality. The debate about
> the exception
> clause and the lack of it in Luke and Mark is
> primarily a question
> about cultural background or the cognitive
> framework, that set of
> assumptions which were held in common by those
> immersed in 'Second
> Temple Judaism'. For that reason it isn't a question
> about language.
>
> For a recent treatment of this I recommend reading
> R.T.France (Mark
> NIGTC) on Mark 10:1-11.
>
>
> Elizabeth Kline
>
>
>
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
Mitch Larramore
Sugar Land, Texas
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list