[B-Greek] Etymological fallacy?
Matthew Williams
kopio at comcast.net
Wed Nov 19 13:39:20 EST 2008
After consulting my hard copy of Moulton and Milligan, it does appear
that whoever the particular scribe is that digitized the text, in
fact made a scribal error! Oops...sorry, this isn't the TC list ;^)
Only one KAT' appears in the hard copy.
--Matt Williams
On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:20 AM, b-greek-request at lists.ibiblio.org wrote:
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:02:47 -0800 (PST)
> From: George F Somsel <gfsomsel at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Etymological fallacy?
> To: Stephen Baldwin <stbaldwi at hotmail.com>, Carl Conrad
> <cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu>, B- Greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Message-ID: <796675.72479.qm at web38506.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> While it is clearly an "exegetical fallacy" to use?the etymology of
> EKKLHSIA in order to posit that the church consists of "called out
> ones", when one goes back to the earlier usage among the Greeks
> there may be a real basis for connecting this with the concept of
> calling out.? Moulton and Milligan deal with the papyrological
> findings mainly from Oxyrhynchus in Egypt and late in relation to
> early Greek, but they have an interesting comment on the word
>
> ?
> [Page 195] ???????? [EKKLHSIA]?????1577
> For the Biblical history of the word ???????? [EKKLHSIA], which
> meant originally any public assembly of citizens summoned by a
> herald, it is sufficient to refer to Hort, The Christian Ecclesia,
> p. 1 ff. It is the LXX term for the community of Israel, whether
> assembled or no. In the Gospels the word is confined to Mt 16:18,
> 18:17, where it denotes Christ?s new ???????? [EKKLHSIA], as
> distinguished from the old. Deissmann (?LAE? p. 112ff.) has
> emphasized the significance of the fact that the Latin-speaking
> people of the West, to whom Christianity came, did not translate
> the word, but simply borrowed it, and cites an interesting
> bilingual inscr. of a.d.103?4, found in the theatre of Ephesus,
> which refers to the gift by a Roman official of a silver image of
> Artemis (cf. Ac 19:24) and other
> statues???? ???????? ??? ???? ?????????[hINA TIQHNTAI KAT KAT'
> EKKLHSIAN] ** (cf. Ac 14:23) ?? ??
> ?????? ??? ??? ??????[EN TWi QEATRWi EPI TWN BASEWN],?or, in the
> parallel text, ita ut [om]n[i e]cclesia supra bases ponerentur.
> Other reff. to ?????????[EKKLHSIAI] in the theatre at Ephesus will
> be found s.v.???????[QEATRON].?For the ?inclusive? as distinguished
> from the ?exclusive? character of the Greek ????????[EKKLHSIA] (cf.
> Hicks ?CR? i. p. 43), we may cite the case of an ????????[EKKLHSIA]
> summoned at Apamea????????? ???????? ?????????[AGOMENHS PANDHMOU
> EKKLHSIAS], which the editor Cagnat (note on IV. 7917) describes
> as ?concilium totius populi Apamensis, civium cum Graecorum, tum
> Romanorum?: see also Ramsay ?C. and B.? ii. p. 465, where the
> inscr. is dated as perhaps of the time of Vespasian and Titus. ?
> MGr? ??????(?)? [EKKLHS(I)A].
> ?
> Moulton, J. H., & Milligan, G. (1930). The vocabulary of the Greek
> Testament. Issued also in eight parts, 1914-1929. (195). London:
> Hodder and Stoughton.
> ?
> My point here being that the assembly was originally?called by a
> herald.? Please remember, however, that "assembly" would be the
> concept understood for the word EKKLHSIA in the NT and not "called
> out."
>
> Is KAT KAT' here a typo?? Does anyone have the dead tree version?
> ?george
> gfsomsel
>
>
> ? search for truth, hear truth,
> learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth,
> defend the truth till death.
>
>
> - Jan Hus
> _________
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list