[B-Greek] EMFASIS in NT Greek
Iver Larsen
iver_larsen at sil.org
Wed Sep 23 03:01:59 EDT 2009
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yancy Smith" <yancywsmith at sbcglobal.net>
To: "'B-Greek B-Greek'" <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: 22. september 2009 20:23
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] EMFASIS in NT Greek
>I agree, Elizabeth. DEISIDAIMWN would then contain an implicit criticism
>("flatterers" of the gods, though BDAG disallows this, evidently because the
>editors did not consider this a case of EMFASIS), but also would contain an
>"out" since it also has a positive connotation. The brilliance of the slight is
>that the readers can "get it" and laugh but the hearers at Mars Hill would not
>be able to determine which meaning he intended. For the ancient Christian
>reader, the facts speak for themselves, for the modern reader they might not
>speak at all. Demetrius says of EMFASIS for the purpose of ASFALEIA that
> "Often what we say is directed toward a tyrant or someone who is vilent in
> some other way, and when we want to censure him, we are compelled to use
> figured speech." (289)
> Πολλάκις δὲ ἢ πρὸς τύραννον ἢ ἄλλως βίαιόν τινα διαλεγόμενοι καὶ ὀνειδίσαι
> ὁρμῶντες χρῄζομεν ἐξ ἀνάγκης σχήματος λόγου,
> POLLAKIS DE H PROS TURANNON H ALLWS BIAION TINA DIALEGOMENOI KAI ONEIDISAI
> hORMWNTES CRHiZOMEN EX ANAGKEHS SCHMATOS LOGOU
>
> "Flattery is shameful. Direct criticism is risky. The best course is the
> middle road, figured speech."
> τὸ μὲν οὖν κολακεύειν αἰσχρόν, τὸ δὲ ἐπιτιμᾶν ἐπισφαλές, ἄριστον δὲ τὸ μεταξύ,
> τοῦτ' ἔστι τὸ ἐσχηματισμένον.
> TO MEN OUN KOLAKEUEIN AISCRON, TO DE EPITIMAN EPISFALES, ARISTON DE TO METAXU,
> TOUT ESTI TO EXCHMATISMENON.
I suppose flattery is shameful when it is clearly deceptive and everyone knows
that the flatterer is lying. However, if the addressee is in a high office, he
might well believe the smooth words, even if the speaker says them in order to
make a good expression or obtain a favor and may not necessarily agree with
those words. When I look at Acts 24:2-4 it sounds like flattery to me and I
doubt that the words would be considered shameful.
Concerning avoiding direct criticism, I think that is very common in many
cultures. At least I am used to living in a culture where politicians will often
use figures of speech to criticize others. When confronted later by journalists
they will always respond: I didn't say that, or I didn't mean it that way.
(Meaning: I was careful to be indirect so that I could always have a way out).
Some of the parables/stories in the OT and NT are indirect criticisms.
This was a challenge for us when translating a particular figure of speech Jesus
used (in Greek hH GENEA hAUTH). For instance, in Mark 8:11 a group of hostile
Pharisees came to Jesus to test him by demanding to see a sign "from Heaven".
Jesus answered them: "Why does this generation seek a sign?" The phrase GENEA
hAUTH refers to the addressees in an indirect and ambiguous way. So, I asked our
national translators how they would use a similar kind of speech, and they
responded quickly. "Oh, yes", they said. "We do this all the time. A public
speaker cannot directly accuse anyone in his audience, but if he wants to
criticize some of them he will say 'some people'. " So we translated this verse
as: "Why do some people want a sign?" In Danish we said for Mrk 8:12: "Certain
people demand signs and wonders, before they are ready to believe. But I tell
you: Such people will get no sign."
A similar figure of speech is to use "I" when criticizing "you". Paul does it in
Gal 2:18 and Rom 7, and maybe other places. The purpose is to avoid offending
the addressees.
Iver Larsen
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list