[B-Greek] Can learning Romanian help you learn Greek? (was Fw: B-Greek Digest, Vol 97, Issue 7
Dony K. Donev
dony at cupandcross.com
Thu Jan 6 13:19:51 EST 2011
Romanian – doubtful, but any Slavic language that subscribes to the
Cyrillic alphabet and respectively Cyrillic grammatical rules will
probably be very helpful, since both are largely borrowed from 9^th
century Byzantine Greek, including, but not limited to: diphthongs,
building of a sentence and word order within it, word formation (with
the exception of the define article, which is a post-fix to the word in
most Slavic languages), participles, which are so hard to translate in
proper English with a single word, verb moods and tenses, gender usage
and even some dynamic equivalents to list a few. This is especially true
in Bible translation, as Slavic alphabet and grammar were formed with
for a specific purpose as a missionary tool to translate the Bible in
the native tongues of Slavs.
Dony Donev
http://probible.net/
On 1/6/2011 1:02 PM, Mark Lightman wrote:
> Vasile wrote:
>
> <Indeed, one cannot learn the Greek middle by trying to understand the
> particularities of the Romanian reflexive. I just meant to say that it
> could be helpful for one whose language does not have this tool to see
> how a 'living' language use some similar construction. One advantage
> is that you can ask any Romanian about the meanings/details, etc. of
> such constructions and get a full understanding of the thing. This
> idea was not prompted by some sudden inspiration of mine but by the
> fact that I noticed that many aspects related to the Greek middle
> voice are just natural to me as a native Romanian speaker, whereas for
> others a lot of analysis is necessary before it is clarified.>
>
> Hi, Vasile,
>
> There are two separate questions here, both worthy of discussion. The first is
> whether learning a little about Romanian, or any other language, will really
> help you understand Greek any better. Linguists like to do this. They like to
> explain a Hebrew construction by some analogue to Navaho. The problem is that
> one doubts how well the linguist knows either language, and at any rate, since
> the reader knows no Navaho or anything about Navaho, the whole thing just leads
> to more meta-linguistic abstraction, which is the argument for sticking to the
> target language.
>
> The other question is which native language will best prepare one for learning
> Greek. You obviously know Romanian better than I ever will, so of course it is
> helpful to YOU. And it may well be, that Romanian, since it has a middle, is
> one of the better native languages to start with to learn Greek. I would think
> German and Russian, because they are somewhat inflective would also be good.
> Italian might be good for a vocab base.
>
>
> But I will say this. English is probably the worse native language to have if
> you want to learn Greek. Why? Two words: Word and order. The English brain
> is programed to think that if something comes first, it is the subject. If this
> word is CLOSE to this, it must GO with that. It is very hard to get over this
> and begin to internalize the infinitely looser Greek word order. It can be
> done, but Lord, it takes much time and re-programming. Starting with a language
> with a freer word order would be a huge help, I think. How free is the Romanian
> word order?
>
> Mark L
>
>
>
> FWSFOROS MARKOS
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list