[B-Greek] Hebrews 2:3
James Ernest
james.ernest at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 00:04:54 EST 2011
Dave asked about syntax. I'm trying to imagine the possibilities:
I guess I always figured ARCHN is acc. object of LABOUSA and that the two together amount, as Carl said, to HRXATO (or the ptc.--what, ARXASA?) after which LALEISQAi is complementary.
But I suppose one cd also entertain the possibility that ARCHN is the absolute usage of the accusative (see LSJ and examples there) and that LABWN LALEISQAI is then on its own, as Dave seemed to be taking it? But then the syntactic relation between LABWN and LALEISQAI becomes, as he noted, puzzling.
James
(typed on iPod)
------------------------------
James D. Ernest, PhD, acquisitions editor
Baker Academic & Brazos Press
business: jernest at bakerpublishinggroup.com
personal: j.d.ernest at bc.edu
-----------------------------
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list